Ratheesh KrishnaVadhyar ([info]ratheesh) wrote,
@ 2006-12-28 11:54:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Palunku

Blessy's latest Malayalam film Palunku got released on last Friday. Normally, we don’t get to see a movie having its first screening at Irinjalakuda, but Palunku was released at Irinjalakuda Mas Theatre too. I didn't want to miss the opportunity to watch a much-awaited Malayalam film on the day of its release, and hence we went to the theatre and watched the matinee show on Friday itself. To our surprise, there were just around ten or fifteen people waiting in the queue for buying tickets, in spite of Mammootty being the hero of the film. The noon show was over at 2, and we tried to judge the quality of the film by observing the facial expressions of the people coming out after the show. We couldn't guess much, and it looked like there were not many people for the noon show too. To my amusement, one person fired a malappadakkam (cracker) near a large picture board of Mammootty installed in front of the theatre by the "Mammootty Fans Association". Probably the film is too good, and the "fan" is celebrating that, I thought.

There were just around fifty people in the theatre for the matinee show, and I think half of them were members of the fan club, who received the titles of the film with great applause. For the first ten minutes of the film, they started clapping whenever a new character appeared on the screen. They got used to it so much that they clapped even when the close-up of Jesus Christ's image on the locket of a kontha was shown on the screen!!

Palunku starts with showing the scenes from the life of Monichen, an uneducated, simpleton farmer living in a village near Adimali (??). He is a person very similar to Madhavan of Kazhcha, but is an extrovert, unlike Madhavan. He leads his routine and uneventful but pleasant life in the village with his wife and two young children, looking after his pepper and cows. The first half an hour of the film shows these scenes in a rather uninteresting, slow and boring manner, and I hoped that good things will come when Monichen relocates to the "City", as his children need to go for schooling in the English Medium school there. Then we see Monichen slowly changing because of city life - Initially he is curious and excited about the various possibilities of life in the City, and joins a "Vayojana Vidyabhyasa Camp" to learn to read and write. Soon, he transforms himself to a moneylender, and to meet the business requirements, he is having to make friends with few local goondas and able men. At his home, his wife welcomes the improvements in living standards aided by equipments like television, refrigerator and washing machine. Changes in life are more drastic as days go by, as Monichen soon starts becoming more ambitious and ventures into multiple businesses, encouraged and assisted by his new-found friend Pilla (Jagathi). How Monichen learns the lessons of Life in the hard way forms the rest of the story.

I have always felt that director Blessy is highly overrated. Immediately after his first film, Kazhcha, he was compared with Padmarajan. Kazhcha was a good-intentioned and well-made film with a lot of freshness, and I liked it very much when I watched it first time. However, when I watched this film second time, when it was shown on television, many of its shortcomings became obvious, and now I feel that it is just an "above-average" film. Blessy's second film, Thanmathra, was a mediocre work. And now, Palunku is just barely watchable. There is five-second long scene in the film where they show a group of birds flying in the sky in background when Monichen talks about few things dreamingly. Except for this short clip, there is absolutely nothing in the film that is thematically new or fresh in its presentation style. Many a times, Blessy seems to be confused regarding what he has to say - Does he want to say that City Life is bad and villages are better? Does he want to portray the effects of greed on human beings? The sentences displayed during the climax scene indicate that Blessy's main intention was probably to make a statement on the attacks on women in Kerala society. Haven't there been far more better films like Kadavu and Bhoothakkannadi which have handled these themes in an artistically superior way? Blessy's film doesn't even entertain, and many times it stoops to the standards of a boring television serial.

Monichen's character is one which doesn't have much of heroic qualities. He doesn't make us feel sympathy for him; He doesn't even make us hate him. I think it would have been challenging for Mammootty to shred the histrionics of a Hero or sympathy-monger and then play the character in such a way as to make us feel that he is a man we would meet anywhere, anytime during our life. Mammootty plays the role well, and that is the only saving grace of the film. Jagathi or anybody else have no major challenges to handle in the film. Photography by Santosh Thundiyil is okay, but Mohan Sithara's background music is horrible.

I wonder why this film was named Palunku (glass). Was it because the film will "break" like Palunku? ;-) I also suspect that the crackers were probably lighted by a member of the Mohanlal Fans Association, and not that of Mammootty's.



(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2006-12-28 06:56 am UTC (link)
Ratheesh..
I was happy that you too feel the same about the movie..i was thinking that i am the only person who did not like this movie..

when people came out of theatre even i tried to guess the outcome of the movie from the audience face..there was a "nirvikaaara manobhaavam" in all faces..also when my mother was in the ticket queue the lady standing infront of her told that her friend gave a review that this movie is not as good as thanmathra..still i expected atleast an average movie from blessy..

like you said..we never feel sorry for the character and blessy was really confused on what his theme is all about....and this movie is not even comparable to bhoothakkannadi..what a brilliant movie it was..palunku was very much disappointing except that scene in which they showed the group of birds flying in the sky...also i hated the symbolisms in the climax where he shout at Gandhiji(was he inspired by lage raho ??)..i think blessy is trying to be brilliant by showing symbolisms like a cow coming to monichan in the climax and then a rainbow in the sky etc etc..

I was really surprised to read the reviews of this movie in net..Sify verdict is Brilliant !!! indiaglitz said blessy is better than his best !! and rediff who always give less stars for good movies gave a 3.5 for this one..

waiting for your review on Notebook..i wanted to see that..

Vinod

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ratheesh
2006-12-28 07:00 am UTC (link)
The rainbow in the climax looked comical to me :-)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-12-28 07:17 am UTC (link)
true :)
even audience were confused whether this is a good movie or a bad one..ppl were telling "onnum parayaanilla ithineckurichu"..may be the movie is bad that there is no need to discuss or the movie is brilliant that it talks for itself..

Vinod

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-12-28 07:19 am UTC (link)
also i will tell you why the movie was named "palunku"..its because monichans heart(manassu) is like a palunku it seems..not my words but blessy's...but he could have told that it is true only for some time in the movie..

Also i was puzzled on why monichan is crying after having an affair with a lady..he had the very chance to opt out rt..nobody was forcing him...

Vinod

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-12-29 04:47 am UTC (link)
"...I also suspect that the crackers were probably lighted by a member of the Mohanlal Fans Association, and not that of Mammootty's" :-) funny indeed

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]diffdrummer
2006-12-28 10:58 pm UTC (link)
Good to read a review of Palunku, was wondering how it would turn out. Appreciate your effort.

Blessy is grossly overrated and to compare him with Padmarajan whose brilliant short stories he is making a mess of, is pure sacrilege.

I didn't understand the hoopla about Kaazcha, it was an ok film at a time when Malayalam movie world was being mishandled by people with serious dearth of talent.It had a lot of cliched dialogs("kudichittund ille?" - that's one dialog I remember when Mammootty's character is obviously drunk) and another gripe I've against Blessy is the way he directs child actors - both in Kaazcha and Thanmathra, they end up looking artificial and plastic, like a processed packaged product, far from real. Now that I've started the tirade against Blessy let me not forget the one last detail - the guy is overly emotional in a Hallmark card kinda way. Had he been Padmarajan reincarnate think about how he could've botched up a cinematic gem like Moonnaampakkam.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ratheesh
2006-12-29 05:02 am UTC (link)
Fully agree with you.

I had liked Kazhcha when I watched it in theater first time - probably because, as you told, it was a time when movies like Salperu Ramankutty and Kalyana Raman were the only other options. When I watched it again in TV recently, it looked just like a major patchwork of a film; Even the performance of Master Yash, and those people surrounding him in the village - all look artificial.

I think Blessy is not really an artist like Padmarajan or Bharathan (with whom he is being compared with). He is just an intelligent craftsman who tries to produce "film packages" with the right set of ingredients targeted towards a subset of film viewers who used to enjoy the films of Padmarajan, Bharathan, Mohan et al. during old days.

Btw, in Palunku too the children end up looking like plastic dolls with that "i am innocent and always with smiles" look.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

From Jo
(Anonymous)
2006-12-29 07:42 am UTC (link)
I agree with you when you say that Blessy is confused about the core theme of the movie. This confusion of Blessy is seen from his previous movie (Thanmathra) onwards. In Thanmathra, he made long, boring lecture sessions by Mohan Lal about good parenting. When a movie tell things like a book does, it loses its 'cinematic' charm. The samething happened with Palunku as well. The pre-release notes said the movie is about farmers' suicide and I had high expectations, but the movie has nothing on that side except the news of Monichan's neighbor's death. While watching the movie, I thought its about an innocent villager's migration problems and of being polluted by the city (it seemed so to the 3/4th of the movie). Then in the last half, we see its about child rape. And when we see the climax sentences, we wonder "so, is this what Blessy wanted to say?"

Mamootty has done an excellent job, there is no question about that. But I wonder why did the director made him cry and cry in the climax scene. Also the climax scene where Mammootty is in the street weeping was totally unnecessary. Looks like the director told him "cry your way to the awards". But I am sure he will win one for just one scene when he finds the body of his daughter in the telephone booth. He is, ofcourse, one of the finest actors in the country.

Palunku is a watchable movie considering the craps we are being fed with these days.

Blessy has to understand that he doesn't have to handle a 100 themes in just one movie and make the viewers wonder what it was all about. Another thing I noticed is that all the child actors in his movies give us brilliant performances, Palunku is no exception. I think the only other director who has this magic to take out the best performance from child actors is Maniratnam.

Jo.
http://jocalling.blogspot.com

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: From Jo
[info]ratheesh
2006-12-29 09:36 am UTC (link)
Mammootty deserves the award for best actor this year, for his performances in Karutha Pakshikal and Palunku. He might actually get the Kerala state award, but I am doubtful regarding the National award - they may give it to John Abraham for Garam Masala.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: From Jo
(Anonymous)
2006-12-29 10:07 pm UTC (link)
>they may give it to John Abraham for Garam Masala.
Hehe, I liked this statement :-))))

-suneesh

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: From Jo
(Anonymous)
2006-12-31 06:19 am UTC (link)
Hey Mr.Idiot,

Are you nuts?????

If you can't understand a good film ,better stop writing nonsenses about films and name it REVIEW. What the heck you know about PAlUNKU man?

Wait for the state film awards, Blessy will get the best director award.

Oru keyboardum 10 viralum undennu karuthi enthu mandatharavum ezhuthi vekkamennu vicharikkaruthu mone, poi nalla cinema enthanennu padikku. Allel nee majestic bustandine kurichu ezhutheda viddiie, allathe ariyathe karyathe kurchu ezhuthi nanam kedalle

Regards,
Arun

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: From Jo
(Anonymous)
2007-01-02 11:18 am UTC (link)
Hi Arun,

I feel Ratheesh has all the rights to express his views thru his blog about any subject he is interested.I would have apperciated if you had expressed your concern on the difference of opinion on this particular topic, which,you seem to have, in a pragmatic way.However, its something remarkable that, there are many who find his "mandatharangal" worth reading and appreciating.:)

No offence meant:))

Regards
Rajesh

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: From Jo
(Anonymous)
2007-01-09 11:56 am UTC (link)
Hi Arun,
You may be a hardcore Mammooty fan or Mohanlal fan. But that doesn't mean that you need to support all their movies. Why the heck people give more importance to actors while viewing movies.
Definitely blessy was confused. You ask 100 people about the theme of the movie and just list down how may of them will tell the message which was displayed at the last without viewing it. Anyway after having said that palunku has lot of plus points, it's just an average movie meant only to take advantage of the sentimental feelings in the same way as TV serails.
Mathew

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: From Jo
(Anonymous)
2007-01-04 07:25 am UTC (link)
Hehe... true!

Then our Malayalam newspapers will celebrate "A Malayalee wins the national award for best actor". :-))

Jo.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jayasankarvs
2006-12-29 11:59 am UTC (link)
I liked Kazhcha only because it touched upon pedophilia. Apart from that, I felt that it ws just about ok; it didn't evoke any strong emotion in me. ANd Tanmatra, as you said is a mediocre movie. The irritating actor who plays Mohan Lal's son hogs most of the screentime. It's mostly the script which has disappointed in both the movies.

(Reply to this)

kazcha
(Anonymous)
2007-01-01 12:45 pm UTC (link)
In kazcha, the kids sequences were inspired by pather panchali. i guess.

(Reply to this)

palunke
(Anonymous)
2007-01-08 08:34 am UTC (link)
Are BUGGI!!!!!!!!

Dont watch any more malayalam films.Watch only BUGGI films like John Abraham,Aravindan films.

(Reply to this)

Mediocrity rules..!!!
[info]rajmohan
2007-01-15 03:58 pm UTC (link)
Last week I could see an interview with Blessy in Asianet. “I myself sometimes get astonished seeing the sequences of my films. I believe that it would be god Himself who gives me the vision of those frames of my films”. Blessy indulged in self-praise in somewhat this way.

Yesterday I saw ‘Palunku’. Yet another mediocre work from Blessy. May be he had good intentions in making the film, may be he had some kind of MESSAGE to deliver. But personally, I am fed up with these holly messengers.

Making a mediocre film is not a crime. But glorification of mediocrity as something great by our mainstream media is creating the real damage. Our media (even the so-called serious ones) has always placed Blessy and his kind of filmmakers on the pedestal. Standing at that false height Blessy could nothing but indulge in such self-praise about his holly vision!

Happy to see that some kind of creative criticism is happening at least at the level of Blogs, even though it may not reach the mainstream society.

- Rajmohan

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Mediocrity rules..!!!
[info]ratheesh
2007-01-15 04:50 pm UTC (link)
Oh, I missed the interview with Blessy! :-)

Yea, "Mediocrity rules" - you said it rightly. Besides, there are not many quality artworks coming from Kerala these days, be it in Cinema or Literature. Probably It just shows one more facet of deterioration of our society, in my perspective.

Also, I am fed up with the over-emphasis given for visual media and sports everywhere in our society these days. Srishanth became famous overnight. Some actor acts in couple of vulgar films, and then he appears on television channels and newspapers everyday, and every kid knows about him. But ask for OV Vijayan, Uroob or P Kunjiraman Nair - not many people could say who they are, especially from the younger generation.

But then, there is nothing or no one to blame here; It just reflects the tastes of the larger population at this moment, and there is nothing to call as Right or Wrong there, I guess.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2007-02-03 12:03 pm UTC (link)
Palunke is a very good fim compared to some other releases on X mas

(Reply to this) (Thread)

This is what we call Review
(Anonymous)
2007-02-05 08:24 am UTC (link)
The world, indeed, is like a dream and its treasures, an alluring mirage! Like the apparent distances in a picture, things have no reality in themselves, but they are like a heat haze. Blessey’s Palunku massively relies on the Buddhist adage that speaks volumes of the supposedly greener pastures and seasoned harvests at the other end of the road, and puts forth a poignant account of the arduous voyage along alien trails.

Monichan (Mammootty) is any other farmer you may find along the mountain ranges of Idukki – the raw odor of rubber plantations and pepper, cardamom and coffee is too profound to be left unnoticed. Sans a proper education, he remains a fine man who leads a blissful life with his wife Soosamma (Lakshmi Sharma) and two daughters, until the devious glitter of urbanization lures him on to a nearby town that offers an assortment of opportunities before him on a silver platter. Not long after, the horrific transmutation is complete, as we watch the man menacingly roam the market place, blood dripping from the fresh meat that he had convincingly grabbed from a debtor. At the end of it all, as another sinister night dawns over the dazzling city lights, Monichan realizes that he has lost quite a lot in the bargain; and that regret, for once, is totally worthless.

Mammootty as Monichan is too brilliant; the actor fabulously reinvents himself and goes on a royal rampage during the last twenty minutes of the film; he exudes an atypical vigor in his performance as the perplexed soul, torn between the turbulent emotions of compassion, adoration, remorse and terror, that’s categorically heart rending and appalling. New find Lakshmi Sharma and the inimitable supporting cast are adequately proficient. Close on the heels of the stupendous Krisshh, Santosh Thundiyil delivers a few singular kicks with his camera that are decidedly unobtrusive, while the admirable tunes set forth by Mohan Sitara flaunt an elusive charm.

Palunku is an ordinary fable of redemption told the extraordinary way. The homecoming of the profligate son has probably been never so radically adapted on the silver screen. Blessey’s protagonist is no meticulous schemer; he is just you and me donning the garb of a peasant, dreaming of a better existence and moving around in a trance as fortune leads him along hitherto untrodden ways. The aroma of the spices unhurriedly giving way to the strapping scent of the hooker’s sweat and later on to the scarlet stench of flesh and gore, is exceedingly nauseating. The disconcerting ambience of a life gone astray lingers blatantly around. The twinge is too evident, the discomfiture too obvious.

Blessey’s new film resolutely reiterates the oft proclaimed maxim of the real tragedy of life - not in that life ends too soon, but in that we wait so long to begin it. Between the commencement and the conclusion of it all lies the tragic tale of a wanton being that subsists and learns, and at any rate valiantly lives.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: This is what we call Review
[info]rajmohan
2007-02-07 04:09 pm UTC (link)
“Analysis: Temporal: As may be seen, the modular and serial ordering of corresponding shots at their regular points of recurrence in all the four sequences (with one change in the fourth), has something schematic about it….The only ‘variable’ shots in these serially ordered sequences made up of regular, repetitive units are those depicting the misdeed of the donkey in each. In the fourth, when it breaks the serial alignment, the sequence falls out of the schema to merge with the course of events in the present.”

At a glance you could mistake the above passage as a quote from some science & technology journal about an alien technical topic. But, this too could be called a film review. The above passage was quoted from a review written by a great film pundit of Kerala in a film magazine on, sadly, John Abraham’s ‘Agraharathil Kazhutha’, luckily published much after the great director’s death.

The person who claims that ‘this is what we call review’ could have tried his maximum, but couldn’t reach the pseudo-intellectual level of the above pundit.

If someone could claim that Mammootty’s acting in ‘Palunku’ is brilliant, then he should be either Mammooty himself or a member of the National award jury. And to praise the background music of the film, one should be deaf. (I couldn’t control my laughter hearing the background music, which suddenly emerged when the bank officer announced to the farmer that his house would be confiscated. Something like a sound of harmonium, which I am familiar to, hearing the ‘kathaprasangam’ of V Sambashivan during my school days.) And regarding the philosophical aspects of the film, you should read J Krishnamurthy after forgetting about the time and money wasted seeing the film.

Cinema, as a powerful visual media, could go much beyond all these storytellers and divine messengers.

- Rajmohan



(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…